Sustainability Activities (ESG)

S: Social data

ESG Data

S: Social data

Please tap to select data.

S: Social data

(1) KPI

Diversity & Inclusion

	Targets	Target Year	Fiscal 2025	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Boundary
Paid leave utilization	Above 65%	Fiscal 2022	-	69.0%	67.9%	66.6%	56.9%	59.8%	68.0%	72.9%	Mitsubishi Estate
Average number of used paid leave days	12 or more	Every year	-	13.1	13.2	12.6	10.8	10.8	12.4	13.6	Mitsubishi Estate
Ratio of female new graduate hires	Above 40%	Every year	51.2%	43.8%	33.9%	35.7%	38.3%	37.8%	37.8%	31.4%	Mitsubishi Estate^*1
Ratio of female mid-career hires	Above 40%	Every year	-	50.0%	37.5%	36.5%	24.4%	17.1%	66.7%	22.2%	Mitsubishi Estate
Ratio of female managers	①above 20%、②30%、③40%	①Fiscal 2030、②Fiscal 2040、③Fiscal 2050	9.2%	8.1%	7.3%	7.2%	6.6%	5.8%	5.8%	5.5%	Mitsubishi Estate^*2
Rate of male employees taking childcare leave of absence^*6	above 100%	Fiscal 2030 ongoing goal	-	84.0%	82.4%	110.6%	75.5%	64.9%	24.0%	21.2%	Mitsubishi Estate^*3
Rate of female employees taking childcare leave of absence	100%	Fiscal 2030 ongoing goal	-	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	98.7%	100.0%	98.7%	100.0%	Mitsubishi Estate^*4
Rate of reinstatement to work after maternity/childcare leave	100%	Fiscal 2030 ongoing goal	-	97.4%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	94.8%	93.8%	96.7%	5 Group companies^*5
Employment rate of persons with disabilities	2.50%	Fiscal 2030 ongoing goal	-	2.50%	2.40%	2.20%	2.30%	2.20%	2.23%	2.22%	5 Group companies^*5

Scroll horizontally

As of April 1 of each fiscal year
As we raised the target in FY2021, the boundary was changed to Mitsubishi Estate、As of April 1 of each fiscal year
From FY2022, the boundary of this target was changed to Mitsubishi Estate
From FY2023, the boundary of this target was changed to Mitsubishi Estate
Mitsubishi Estate, Mitsubishi Jisho Property Management, Mitsubishi Estate Residence, Mitsubishi Jisho Sekkei, Mitsubishi Real Estate Services
Ratio of "the number of male employees who took childcare leave during the fiscal year (b)" to "the number of male employees whose spouse gave birth to a child/children during the fiscal year (a)" (b/a). （Since (b) includes employees who had a child before the fiscal year but did not take the leave within the fiscal year in which the child/children was/were born, and who newly took the leave in the fiscal year, the rate may exceed 100%.

Health Management

	Targets	Target Year	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Boundary
Percentage of high-risk group for metabolic syndrome (aged 40 or older^*)	(1) 7.5% (2) 5%	(1) Fiscal 2025 (2) Fiscal 2030	8.6%	9.8%	7.5%	9.4%	9.4%	-	-	Mitsubishi Estate^*1
Percentage of healthy group (aged 40 or older^*)	(1) 29.8% (2) 32.8%	(1) Fiscal 2025 (2) Fiscal 2030	32.0%	31.9%	23.9%	21.7%	26.8%	-	-	Mitsubishi Estate^*1
Cancer screening rate	90.00%	Every year from FY2021 – FY2030	89.5%	83.8%	88.6%	88.0%	80.7%	-	-	Mitsubishi Estate^*1
High stress group	Maintain percentage of 10% or lower (national average: 10%)	Every year from FY2021 – FY2031	6.9%	6.5%	5.5%	4.0%	4.7%	5.5%	-	Mitsubishi Estate^*2

Scroll horizontally

Applies to head and branch office employees
Includes seconded staff

Resilient Urban Development

	Targets	Target Year	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Boundary
Rate of employees with first aid provider qualification	100%	Fiscal 2030 ongoing goal	76.5%	82.0%	75.3%	72.4%	63.0%	61.0%	64.0%	2 Group companies^*

Scroll horizontally

Mitsubishi Estate, Mitsubishi Jisho Property Management

Other

	Targets	Target Year	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Boundary
Employee absentee rate	0%	Fiscal 2030 ongoing goal	0.9%	0.7%	0.8%	0.9%	0.9%	0.8%	0.8%	5 Group companies^*1
Rate of provision of accessible toilets	100%	Fiscal 2030 ongoing goal	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	Newly constructed^2, large-scale^3 office buildings and commercial facilities in Japan
Rate of barrier-free buildings	100%	Fiscal 2030 ongoing goal	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	Newly constructed^2, large-scale^3 office buildings and commercial facilities in Japan
Percentage of wood that meets sustainabile sourcing code^*4 (certified and domestically produced) used for formwork concrete panels	100%	2030	-	81%	80%	-	-	-	-	3 Group companies^*5

Scroll horizontally

Mitsubishi Estate, Mitsubishi Jisho Property Management, Mitsubishi Estate Residence, Mitsubishi Jisho Sekkei, Mitsubishi Real Estate Services
Completed in 2002 onward
Total floor area: 100,000m² or more
The standards for sustainability-conscious procurement, with reference to international agreements and codes of conduct in various fields related to sustainability
From FY2023, the boundary of this target was changed to 3 Group companies. Mitsubishi Estate, Tokyo Ryutsu Center (TRC) , Mitsubishi Estate SIMON

(2) Other

1. Human Resources

I) Mitsubishi Estate Employment Conditions

Workforce breakdown (As of the beginning of each fiscal year)

		Fiscal 2025		Fiscal 2024		Fiscal 2023		Fiscal 2022		Fiscal 2021		Fiscal 2020		Fiscal 2019		Fiscal 2018
		Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage
Men		1,426	69.6%	1,447	71.2%	1,454	71.8%	1,401	72.9%	1,369	74.0%	1,333	75.4%	1,233	75.7%	1,249	77.1%
	(Of which, regular employees)	1,204	58.8%	1,189	58.5%	1,180	58.3%	1,148	59.7%	1,122	60.6%	1,104	62.4%	1,080	66.3%	1,108	68.4%
	- Of which, managers	661	32.3%	679	33.4%	659	32.6%	659	34.3%	662	35.8%	682	38.6%	668	41.0%	690	42.6%
	- Of which, non-managerial employees	543	26.5%	510	25.1%	521	25.7%	489	25.4%	460	24.9%	422	23.9%	412	25.3%	418	25.8%
	(Of which, short-term contract workers)	222	10.8%	258	12.7%	274	13.5%	253	13.2%	247	13.3%	229	12.9%	153	9.4%	141	8.7%
Women		623	30.4%	586	28.8%	570	28.2%	522	27.1%	482	26.0%	436	24.6%	396	24.3%	372	22.9%
	(Of which, regular employees)	506	24.7%	466	22.9%	434	21.4%	390	20.3%	352	19.0%	328	18.5%	306	18.8%	283	17.5%
	- Of which, managers	67	3.3%	60	3.0%	54	2.7%	51	2.7%	47	2.5%	42	2.4%	39	2.4%	42	2.6%
	- Of which, non-managerial employees	439	21.4%	406	20.0%	380	18.8%	339	17.6%	305	16.5%	286	16.2%	267	16.4%	241	14.9%
	(Of which, short-term contract workers)	117	5.7%	120	5.9%	136	6.7%	132	6.9%	130	7.0%	108	6.1%	90	5.5%	89	5.5%
Total		2,049	100.0%	2,033	100.0%	2,024	100.0%	1,923	100.0%	1,851	100.0%	1,769	100.0%	1,629	100.0%	1,621	100.0%
	(Of which, regular employees)	1,710	83.5%	1,655	81.4%	1,614	79.7%	1,538	80.0%	1,474	79.6%	1,432	80.9%	1,386	85.1%	1,391	85.8%
	- Of which, managers	728	35.5%	739	36.4%	713	35.2%	710	36.9%	709	38.3%	724	40.9%	707	43.4%	732	45.2%
	- Of which, non-managerial employees	982	47.9%	916	45.1%	901	44.5%	828	43.1%	765	41.3%	708	40.0%	679	41.7%	659	40.7%
	(Of which, short-term contract workers)	339	16.5%	378	18.6%	410	20.3%	385	20.0%	377	20.4%	337	19.1%	243	14.9%	230	14.2%

Scroll horizontally

Workforce profile, by age bracket (As of April 1, 2025)

	Total		20-29		30-39		40-49		50-59		60 and over
	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage
Men	1,426	69.6%	209	57.6%	399	63.5%	251	71.3%	393	76.3%	174	91.1%
Women	623	30.4%	154	42.4%	229	36.5%	101	28.7%	122	23.7%	17	8.9%
Total	2,049	100%	363	100%	628	100%	352	100%	515	100%	191	100%

Scroll horizontally

Percentage of female managers (As of the beginning of each fiscal year)

	Fiscal 2025	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018
Female employees as percentage of all employees	30.4%	28.8%	28.2%	27.1%	26.0%	24.6%	24.3%	22.9%
Female subsection chiefs as percentage of all subsection chiefs	33.1%	30.0%	27.7%	23.9%	21.1%	20.3%	16.9%	15.9%
Female managers as percentage of all managers	8.4%	8.1%	7.3%	7.2%	6.6%	5.8%	5.8%	5.5%
Female junior managers as percentage of all junior managers	17.7%	17.6%	17.3%	17.5%	17.4%	15.6%	15.9%	14.4%
Female middle managers as percentage of all middle managers	4.8%	4.9%	3.8%	4.0%	4.7%	4.3%	3.2%	3.0%
Female senior managers as percentage of all senior managers	3.1%	2.6%	2.6%	2.3%	1.1%	0.4%	0.4%	0.0%
Female non-back office managers as percentage of all non-back office managers	9.0%	7.8%	6.8%	7.0%	6.4%	5.1%	5.1%	6.8%
Female employees in STEM-related positions as percentage of total STEM positions	28.7%	27.4%	26.4%	26.5%	26.4%	26.4%	-	-

Scroll horizontally

Percentage of employees by nationality（As of the beginning of each fiscal year)

		Fiscal 2025	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018
Percentage of all full time employees by nationality
	- Japan	99.2%	99.4%	99.4%	99.5%	99.6%	99.7%	99.6%	99.6%
	- Other	0.8%	0.6%	0.6%	0.5%	0.4%	0.3%	0.4%	0.4%
	Total	1,710	1,655	1,614	1,538	1,474	1,432	1,386	1,391
Percentage of managers by nationality
	- Japan	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	- Other	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
	Total	728	739	713	710	709	724	707	732

Scroll horizontally

New hires and people leaving the company (As of the beginning of each fiscal year)

			Fiscal 2025	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018
New employees (new graduate hires and mid-career hires)			43	94	104	94	92	80	58	53
	(Breakdown by gender)
		- Male percentage	48.8%	53.2%	64.4%	63.8%	68.5%	71.3%	51.7%	71.7%
		- Female percentage	51.2%	46.8%	35.6%	36.2%	31.5%	28.8%	48.3%	28.3%
	(Breakdown by age)
		- Percentage of < 30 years old	100.0%	67.0%	64.4%	53.2%	65.2%	60.0%	63.8%	66.0%
		- Percentage of 30-50 years old	0.0%	33.0%	34.6%	46.8%	34.8%	38.8%	36.2%	34.0%
		- Percentage of > 50 years old	2.3%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	1.3%	0.0%	0.0%
	(Breakdown by nationality)
		- Percentage of Japanese nationality	95.3%	98.9%	100.0%	96.8%	97.8%	96.3%	98.3%	100.0%
		- Percentage of other nationalities	4.7%	1.1%	0.0%	3.2%	2.2%	3.8%	1.7%	0.0%
	(Breakdown by positions)
		- Percentage of non-managers	100%	90.4%	98.1%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		- Percentage of junior managers	0.0%	9.6%	2.9%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
		- Percentage of middle managers	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
		- Percentage of senior managers	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
New graduate hires			43	48	56	42	47	45	37	35
	- Male percentage		48.8%	56.2%	66.1%	64.3%	61.7%	62.2%	62.2%	68.6%
	- Female percentage		51.2%	43.8%	33.9%	35.7%	38.3%	37.8%	37.8%	31.4%
Mid-career hires			-	46	48	52	45	35	21	18
	- Male percentage		-	50.0%	62.5%	63.5%	75.6%	82.9%	33.3%	77.8%
	- Female percentage		-	50.0%	37.5%	36.5%	24.4%	17.1%	66.7%	22.2%
Number of employees leaving company (including those retiring at mandatory retirement age)			-	79	46	47	47	48	77	49
	(Breakdown by gender)
		- Male percentage	-	75.9%	84.8%	83.0%	89.4%	83.3%	-	-
		- Female percentage	-	24.1%	15.2%	17.0%	10.6%	16.7%	-	-
	(Breakdown by age)
		- Percentage of < 30 years old	-	7.6%	8.5%	2.1%	4.3%	2.1%	-	-
		- Percentage of 30-50 years old	-	34.2%	12.8%	10.6%	12.8%	2.1%	-	-
		- Percentage of > 50 years old	-	58.2%	76.6%	87.2%	83.0%	97.9%	-	-
	(Breakdown by nationality)
		- Percentage of Japanese nationality	-	100.0%	97.9%	97.9%	100%	100%	-	-
		- Percentage of other nationalities	-	0%	0%	2.1%	0%	0%	-	-
	(Breakdown by positions)
		- Percentage of non-managers	-	36.7%	23.4%	29.8%	25.5%	22.9%	-	-
		- Percentage of junior managers	-	11.4%	6.4%	17.0%	19.1%	12.5%	-	-
		- Percentage of middle managers	-	15.2%	2.1%	25.5%	34.0%	18.8%	-	-
		- Percentage of senior managers	-	36.7%	21.3%	27.7%	21.3%	45.8%	-	-
Percentage of employees voluntary turnover rate			-	1.3%	0.7%	0.4%	0.5%	0.1%	1.2%	1.2%
Total employee turnover rate			-	4.6%	2.8%	2.9%	3.2%	3.4%	5.6%	1.2%

Scroll horizontally

Average number of years of continuous service by gender (As of the end of each fiscal year)

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018
Men	17.9	17.6	18.0	18.6	19.1	19.6	19.5
Women	12.4	12.7	13.1	13.7	14.3	15.3	16.9

Scroll horizontally

As of the end of each fiscal year

Labor union

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Fiscal 2017
Labor union members as percentage of employees^*	70.5%	71.9%	70.7%	70.8%	74.8%	70.3%	70.0%	71.7%

Scroll horizontally

Excluding employees in managerial positions

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Fiscal 2017
Number of labor standard infringements or allegations against the company	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Scroll horizontally

2. Diversity

Health & safety (Employee)

		Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Fiscal 2017	Boundary
Total accidents		4	7	2	2	1	2	1	2	Mitsubishi Estate
	- Fatalities	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	- Lost working time	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0
	- Total working days lost	20	0	0	0	0	0	71	0
Absentee rate		0.67%	0.46%	0.62%	0.22%	0.76%	0.67%	0.94%	0.91%	Mitsubishi Estate
Injury rate		0.0014%	0.0023%	0.0007%	0.0008%	0.0005%	0.001%	0.0005%	0.001%	Mitsubishi Estate
Lost day incident rate^*1		0.74%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.316%	0%	Mitsubishi Estate
Lost-time injury frequency rate (LTIFR)		1.85%	3.08%	0.99%	1.10%	0.63%	1.30%	0.66%	1.35%	Mitsubishi Estate
Absenteeism^*2		7.9%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Mitsubishi Estate
	Number of respondents	1,373	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Response rate	89.5%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Presenteeism^*3		18.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Mitsubishi Estate
	Number of respondents	1,373	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Response rate	89.5%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Medical examination rate		100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	97%	-	Mitsubishi Estate
Percentage of employees taking health and safety training^*4		100%	100%	86%	91%	100%	100%	95.0%	93.2%	Mitsubishi Estate
Number of employees taking health and safety training^*4		61	28	31	30	25	21	19	41	Mitsubishi Estate

Scroll horizontally

Total number of lost day due to injury/ Total number of actual working hours X 1,000
The percentage of employees who responded that they had been absent or taken leave for six or more days due to illness or injury in the past year.
This is the percentage obtained by subtracting from 100% the percentage measured by "Evaluating your own work performance over the past four weeks (1-100%), with the performance you could perform when not suffering from illness or injury being 100%."
This training is provided through newly-appointed Manager Class 1 training

Employee satisfaction and customer satisfaction

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Fiscal 2017	Boundary
Employee satisfaction/Engagement survey score^*1	73	86.2%	84.5%	88.5%	86.7%	84.5%	-	-	Mitsubishi Estate
Overall customer satisfaction with sales/percentage of high ratings^*2	90.2%	92.0%	89.9%	87.3%	86.7%	86.4%	82.6%	-	Mitsubishi Estate Residence

Scroll horizontally

From FY2024 onward: Overall engagement survey score. Engagement scores are calculated using Wevox, an engagement measurement tool provided by Atrae, Inc. For reference: The average overall score for construction and real estate companies with 1,001 to 5,000 employees is 65.
Until FY2023: Percentage of employees who responded “Yes” to the question “Do you feel your job is rewarding?” in an internal employee survey.
Up to fiscal 2018: percentage of ratings in top 2 out of 7 evaluation levels; From fiscal 2019: percentage of ratings in top 2 out of 5 evaluation levels

Number of employees using personnel programs

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Fiscal 2017	Unit	Boundary
Number of employees taking childcare leave of absence	204	160	230	217	151	116	109	-	people	5 Group companies^*1
Number of employees taking nursing care leave of absence	1	2	1	3	2	0	0	-	people	5 Group companies^*1
Number of employees working shorter hours for childcare and nursing care	192	173	145	143	120	108	126	-	people	5 Group companies^*1
Number of employees using volunteer leave	8	8	15	0	0	10	28	8	Total number of people	Mitsubishi Estate
Number of employees using social learning^*2	12	13	9	0	0	0	1	7	Total number of people	Mitsubishi Estate
Number of employees using volunteer insurance	129	72	103	46	1	12	2	8	Total number of people	Mitsubishi Estate Group
Number of employees using subsidies for volunteering	94	18	70	42	8	17	16	36	Total number of people	Mitsubishi Estate Group
Number of employees using subsidy program for travel expenses to volunteer in disaster-affected areas^*2	5	5	0	0	0	3	5	10	Total number of people	Mitsubishi Estate Group

Scroll horizontally

Mitsubishi Estate, Mitsubishi Jisho Property Management, Mitsubishi Estate Residence, Mitsubishi Jisho Sekkei, Mitsubishi Real Estate Services
Program that allows volunteering during working hours

Human resource development

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Unit	Boundary
Training time per employee per year	11.6	9.9	9.2	8.1	8.2	7.6	8.7	hours per year	Mitsubishi Estate
Training cost per employee per year	101,904	96,693	96,467	85,668	75,648	84,482	127,989	yen per year	Mitsubishi Estate

Scroll horizontally

Human rights

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Fiscal 2017	Unit	Boundary
Allegations concerning human rights and harassment	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	cases	Mitsubishi Estate
Annual total hours of human rights training at Mitsubishi Estate Group	65,440	50,220	33,400	142,230	110,940	169,090	204,080	185,025	minutes	Mitsubishi Estate
Annual total number of companies taking human rights training at Mitsubishi Estate Group	59	75	25	59	29	23	22	34	number	Mitsubishi Estate
Annual total participants of human rights training at Mitsubishi Estate Group	775	588	371	1,019	1,600	1,018	1,891	544	people	Mitsubishi Estate
Annual total hours of human rights training at Mitsubishi Estate	248,415	172,830	33,700	129,460	54,790	35,650	101	105	minutes	Mitsubishi Estate
Annual total participants of human rights training at Mitsubishi Estate	3,392	2,354	368	1,433	608	308	1,116	894	people	Mitsubishi Estate

Scroll horizontally

Percentage of employees taking training programs (Mitsubishi Estate)

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Fiscal 2017
Percentage of employees taking sexual harassment prevention training	92.2%	90.0%	91.9%	94.0%	89.4%	97.5%	100%	-
Newly-appointed Manager Class 1 training	100.0%	100.0%	86.1%	90.9%	100%	100%	95.0%	93.2%

Scroll horizontally

Resilience

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Fiscal 2021	Fiscal 2020	Fiscal 2019	Fiscal 2018	Boundary
Rate of buildings that are to take in stranded commuters^*1	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	92.3%	92.3%	92.3%	Newly constructed^2, large-scale^3 office buildings and commercial facilities in Japan

Scroll horizontally

Facilities that have signed an agreement with the government to accept stranded commuters and facilities that have voluntarily formulated a policy and plan for accepting stranded commuters.
Completed in 2002 onward
Floor area: 100,000m² or more

Annual salary of employees (Mitsubishi Estate)

	Fiscal 2024		Fiscal 2023		Fiscal 2022		Fiscal 2021		Fiscal 2020		Fiscal 2019		Fiscal 2018		Fiscal 2017
	Amount (yen)	Number of people	Amount (yen)	Number of people	Amount (yen)	Number of people	Amount (yen)	Number of people	Amount (yen)	Number of people	Amount (yen)	Number of people	Amount (yen)	Number of people	Amount (yen)	Number of people
Average annual salary of employees	13,478,400	1,242	12,732,428	1,184	12,463,090	1,091	12,647,559	1,053	12,675,663	953	12,735,234	903	12,476,724	899	12,290,437	806

Scroll horizontally

Gender Pay Gap

	Fiscal 2024	Fiscal 2023	Fiscal 2022	Boundary
Mean gender pay gap of all employees	53.30%	53.00%	52.20%	Mitsubishi Estate
Mean gender pay gap of full-time employees	56.30%	56.00%	55.80%	Mitsubishi Estate
Mean gernder pay gap of part-time and non-permanent workers	44.20%	42.90%	44.80%	Mitsubishi Estate

Scroll horizontally

3. Supply chain management related data

Supplier code of code distrubited

	FY2024	FY2023	FY2022	Boundary
Construction companies	100%	100%	100%	Mitsubishi Estate, Mitsubishi Estate Residence
Cleaning companies	100%	100%	100%	Mitsubishi Jisho Property Management, Mitsubishi Estate Hotels & Resorts, Mitsubishi Jisho Commuity

Scroll horizontally

SAQ (Self-Assessment Questionnaire)

			FY2024	FY2023	FY2022
Construction companies
	Mitsubishi Estate (Projects)		3	3	3
		- Tier 1 suppliers	3	3	3
		- Tier 2 suppliers	42	7	20
		- Tier 3 suppliers	33	6	14
	Mitsubishi Estate Residence (Projects)		3	2	2
		- Tier 1 suppliers	2	2	2
		- Tier 2 suppliers	3	2	3
		- Tier 3 suppliers	2	2	1
Cleaning companies
	Mitsubishi Jisho Property Management
		- Tier 1 suppliers	3	1	3
		- Tier 2 suppliers	0	1	6
	Royal Park Hotel & Resorts
		- Tier 1 suppliers	2	1	1
		- Tier 2 suppliers	0	1	3
	Mitsubishi Jisho Community
		- Tier 1 suppliers	0	0	1
		- Tier 2 suppliers	0	0	3

Scroll horizontally

Questionnaire survey targeting suppliers with high sustainability risks

DFF Inc., MITSUBISHI ESTATE CO., LTD.